The attribute claimant
points to an <agent>
or <person>
who makes a claim. @claimant
within <body>
indicates the default persons to be credited or blamed for an assertion.
Claimants are not to be confused with the editor of a TAN file. If an editor X writes a TAN-c file that says that person Y makes such-and-such a claim, then the implication is that X claims that Y claims that....
This attribute is taken into account before all other attributes. That is, @claimant
is to be interpreted to mean: "@claimant
states the following:...." Multiple values of @claimant
are interpreted to mean "and", resulting in distribution of the claim (e.g., claimant="x y" becomes "x claims that..." and "y claims that...").
If you wish to claim that claimant X claimed that claimant Y claimed that claimant Z...., only the original claimant is given to @claimant
, and each of the other claimants are placed in a @subject
in an embedded <claim>
that serves as the object of the master <claim>
.
This attribute is inheritable. See the section called “Attribute inheritability and priority”
Formal Definition
Defined at:
TAN-A-div.rng
Used by: ~body-content-non-class-2
, ~claim
Example 8.12. @claimant
<TAN-A-div TAN-version="2018" id="tag:parkj@textalign.net,2015:ar.cat.tan-a-div:claims">
<head>
.........
</head>
<body claimant="lmp">
<comment when="2017-03-10-05:00" who="park">The following two claims interpret
Minio-Paluello's apparatus criticus entry for 1a2, which claims that Andronicus and
Boethus might have omitted τῆς οὐσίας (based on what Porphyry and Dexippus say) and
asserts that the reading adopted is found in the seven commentators. This interpretation
sticks close to M-P's original, and does not fill in important gaps. For example,
Dexippus's remark comes from his commentary, 1.18 (p. 21.20) and is reliant wholly on a
fragment of Porphyry preserved in Simplicius's commentary, p. 30.1-2. Furthermore, a
careful reading of these texts shows that Porphyry claimed not that Andronicus and
Boethus omitted the text, or relied on sources that had omitted it, but that they
observed that there were manuscripts that had done so.</comment>
<claim subject="dexippus porphyry">
.........
</claim>
<claim subject="herminus comm-omnes" verb="agrees">
.........
</claim>
.........
</body>
</TAN-A-div>
Note | |
---|---|
Taken from ar.cat.tan-a-div.claims |
Example 8.13. @claimant
<TAN-A-div TAN-version="2018" id="tag:parkj@textalign.net,2015:ar.cat.tan-a-div">
<head>
.........
</head>
<body claimant="park">
<claim verb="is-about" object="predication">
.........
</claim>
</body>
</TAN-A-div>
Note | |
---|---|
Taken from ar.cat.tan-a-div |
Example 8.14. @claimant
<TAN-A-div TAN-version="2018" id="tag:parkj@textalign.net,2015:ring01-TAN-A-ring02">
<head>
.........
</head>
<body claimant="park"/>
</TAN-A-div>
Note | |
---|---|
Taken from ringoroses.div.1 |